Letter to the Editor

Vol. 117: Issue 4 - August 2025

Spinal drop metastases of choroid plexus papilloma: a brief report and updated literature review

Authors

Keywords: Choroid plexus papilloma, atypical choroid plexus papilloma, cerebrospinal fluid, metastases, spinal drop, prognosis
Publication Date: 2025-10-17

Summary

Choroid plexus papillomas (CPPs) are rare central nervous system benign tumours and spinal metastases are even less frequent. Herein, we describe a case of a 51-year-old man with several episodes of loss of consciousness. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) displayed a fourth ventricle contrast-enhancing lesion that was totally resected, and histopathological findings showed a papillary neoplasm derived from choroid plexus epithelium, with mild pleomorphism and absence of mitotic activity, consistent with CPP. Two months after the first operation, multiple spinal drop metastases at L4, L5 and S1-S2 were revealed through spine MRI. Histological examination of the spinal lesions fulfilled as well the diagnostic criteria for CPP. Radiological and histological findings are presented, and the relevant literature of spinal spreading of CPPs is discussed. This special case, together with the literature review, helps expanding the spectrum of knowledge on benign CPPs, their potential for disease spread and progression and highlights the need to identify biomarkers that correlate with clinical behaviour.

Article

Choroid plexus tumours (CPTs) are extra-axial neoplasms, typically located within the ventricular system where they originate from the neuroepithelial lining of the choroid plexus. Collectively, they comprise a spectrum of three entities with worsening clinical behaviour: choroid plexus papillomas (CPPs), atypical choroid plexus papillomas (aCPPs) and choroid plexus carcinomas (CPCs). According to the 5th Edition of The WHO Classification of Central Nervous System Tumours1, CPP is a benign neoplasm with very low or absent mitotic activity (WHO grade 1). Although prognosis is generally considered excellent2,3, even benign CPPs may seed cells into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), resulting in drop spinal metastases4. The latter event is markedly more common in the malignant counterpart where patients’ poor outcome is associated with leptomeningeal seeding, as emerged in a recent case series of CPCs5. Although CPPs metastatic potential is considered extremely rare, a growing number of cases of CSF spreading have been described over the last few decades. Herein, we describe spinal drop metastases of CPP occurring upon initial presentation in an adult patient. Clinical, radiological and histological findings are presented, and the relevant literature is discussed.

A 51-year-old man was recently admitted to our Neurosurgical Department after several episodes of loss of consciousness. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a fourth ventricle contrast-enhancing lesion, and the patient underwent gross total resection (GTR) of the tumour mass. Haematoxylin and eosin (HE) slides revealed a papillary arranged proliferation of cuboidal to columnar monomorphic cells disposed in a single layer and resembling normal choroid plexus. Mild nuclear pleomorphism, absent mitotic activity and lack of additional atypical morphological features were also recorded. Consistently with the morphological features, immunohistochemistry showed positive stains for pancytokeratin AE1/AE3, vimentin, S-100 and focally for CK7. The Ki-67 proliferation index was extremely low (2%). In consideration of the histopathological findings, the tumour was classified as CPP WHO grade 1. After surgery, the patient recovered well and was dismissed without any postoperative neurological deficits. Following the Multidisciplinary Tumour Board discussion of the case, a brain and spine MRI was performed with a staging purpose two months later, revealing three nodular intradural contrast enhancing lesions at the level of the L4, L5 vertebrae and S1-S2 inter-somatic space, respectively. At the preoperative neurological examination, the patient showed no pathological signs or symptoms related to the MRI spinal findings. The patient underwent microsurgery in order to obtain histopathological diagnostic confirmation, with neural decompression through right L4, L5 hemilaminectomy. Histopathological examination of the spinal lesion showed a papillary architecture with slightly increased mitotic activity (1 mitoses/10 HPFs of 0.23 mm2), mild nuclear pleomorphism and focal blurring of the papillary pattern. Immunohistochemical findings corresponded to those of the fourth ventricle lesion. The absence of significant mitotic activity, as well as absence of histological features of anaplasia made the diagnosis consistent with spinal dissemination of the previously known CPP. The patient recovered well, with no postoperative neurological impairment and in consideration of the residual disease, a craniospinal radiation therapy plan was undertaken in order to treat the residual spinal cord lesions. Histopathology and imaging findings of both ventricular and spinal lesions are illustrated in Figure 1.

Spinal drop lesions of CPPs are considered a highly uncommon event. We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for previous reports of CPPs with disseminated spinal drop lesions. Tumour spinal metastases through CSF pathway have been occasionally described; 24 such cases have been reported in the literature4,6-26. The median age at diagnosis of the collected series is 38 years (range: 7-74), the median time from the primary tumour to spinal metastases is 3 years (range: 0-19 years), including 9 of 24 with spinal disease upon initial presentation. Therefore, although the spinal spread is considered a rare event in the natural history of the disease, the number of cases described in the literature appears substantial, raising the doubt that spinal spread is actually an underestimated event, and that the natural biology of this tumour is still poorly understood. The full list of previously published cases with detailed clinicopathological features is summarized in Table I. The increased mitotic activity represents the only atypical histological feature independently associated with recurrence, based on a retrospective series of CPP patients27, and is therefore the main criteria for grading according to the 5th Edition of The WHO Classification of Central Nervous System Tumours1. Although the CPTs spectrum of entities is histologically defined, median expression percentages of both the Ki-67 proliferation marker and the p53 tumour suppressor protein raise across the three histological subtypes (from CPP to APP and then CPC)28, suggesting an ordinal categorisation of increasingly severe CPTs based on immunohistochemical findings. Normal choroid plexus shows a Ki-67 proliferation index of nearly zero, while mean values of 1.3-4.5%, 5.8-9.1%, and 13.4-20.3% have been reported in CPPs, aCPPs and CPCs respectively28-30. Prognostic correlations have also been described for various biomarkers, such as S100, transthyretin, and CD4429, but they did not find satisfactory confirmation as helpful tools in grading CPTs in individual cases to be included as markers of grading. Therefore, a better knowledge of molecular factors involved in CPT biology is needed to develop prognostic biomarkers that are able to identify patients at recurrence risk. Chromosomal imbalances, such as duplications and deletions, have been recognised in CPPs31. Chromosomes 7, 12, 15, 17, and 18 were found duplicated in CPP31. However, the total number of specific chromosomal gains or losses does not seem to impact on overall survival in CPPs patients32. Furthermore, frequent hyperdiploidy in CPPs and aCPPs were detected and the two entities appear very similar in their cytogenetic profiles32, in contrast to CPC that markedly differs from the CPP/aCPP group, typically showing abundant chromosomal losses32. Methylation profiling of choroid plexus tumours provided useful prognostic information in addition to histopathology33, revealing 3 distinct subgroups: pediatric low-risk choroid plexus tumours (cluster 1), adult low-risk choroid plexus tumours (cluster 2), and pediatric high-risk choroid plexus tumours (cluster 3). The authors highlighted both the opportunities and pitfalls of methylation profiling for CPTs tumours. In their study, a subset of CPPs and aCPPs that carried an increased risk of recurrence and clustered with CPCs was identified. Multivariate regression models revealed only WHO grade as an independent predictor of overall survival, and only WHO grade and TP53 status were independent predictors of progression-free survival33. Clinical management of CPP patients represents a critical point. The independent prognostic clinical variables for adult patients with CPT include age34, tumour size34, extent of resection34, radio- and chemotherapy34,35. Since disseminated CPPs are uncommon, there are no standardised treatment protocols. Many patients receive targeted radiotherapy to the spinal lesions and reports of various chemotherapy regimens are described21,36. Furthermore, clinical benefit of bevacizumab has been reported37. Some patients remain stable without any adjuvant treatment, making the evaluation of stable disease a demanding task. In conclusion, spinal drop lesions of CPPs are a rare but underestimated event so that a spine MRI may be recommended. Larger case cohorts with complete molecular profiling could further help to clarify pathogenesis and prognosis of CPPs with such unusual clinical behaviour and could represent a useful tool for patient risk stratification and therapeutic management.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

FUNDING

This research received no external funding.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

All listed authors contributed to the production of this manuscript and are listed in the appropriate order.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATION

The research was conducted ethically, with all study procedures being performed in accordance with the requirements of the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant/patient for study participation and data publication.

History

Received: November 19, 2024

Accepted: February 9, 2025

Figures and tables

Figure 1. Imaging and histopathological finding of the fourth ventricle and spinal lesion. (A) Sagittal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image showing lesion obliterating the fourth ventricle. (B) Haematoxylin and eosin slide of the fourth ventricle lesion, showing well differentiated fibrovascular fronds with cells showing round to ovoid, monomorphic nuclei, and absent mitotic activity [magnification 100x, scale bar 200 μm]. (C) Sagittal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image showing enhancing lesions at L4, L5 and S1-S2. (D - E) Histopathological findings of the spinal lesions: haematoxylin and eosin slide showing a papillary arranged proliferation of cells with pleomorphic nuclei and focal blurring of the papillary pattern [D: magnification 200x, scale bar 100 μm; E: magnification 400x, scale bar 50 μm]. (F) S-100 positive stain [(magnification 200x, scale bar 100 μm]. (G) AE1/AE3 pancytokeratin positive stain [magnification 200x, scale bar 100 μm].

Author Year Age Sex PT site WHO grade (PT) Surgery (PT) Spinal MT site WHO grade (MT) Surgery (MT) Time to spinal MT Adjuvant therapy FU (time from MT) Ref.
Masuzawa et al. 1981 7 M 4th ventricle, CPA 1 STR C6-C7 1 STR 4 years None NA [6]
Domingues et al 1991 35 F Foramen magnum 1 STR L3-L4 1 None Synchronous None NA [7]
Shakespeare et al. 1997 27 F 4th ventricle 1 STR Multiple 1 None 3 years CHT AWD (13 months) [8]
Leblanc et al. 1998 19 F 4th ventricle 1 GTR Multiple 1 STR Synchronous None AWD (3 years) [9]
Jagielski et al. 2001 50 M 3rd, 4th ventricles 1 STR Multiple 1 STR 3 years RT DOD (1 year) [10]
Heese et al. 2002 38 M 4th ventricle 1 GTR L1-L2 1 None Synchronous None AWD (8 months) [11]
McEvoy et al. 2002 51 M 4th ventricle 1 GTR S1-S2 1 STR 5 years None NA [12]
Doglietto et al. 2005 16 M Cisterna magna, CPA 1 GTR L5-S1 1 None Synchronous None NA [13]
Yu et al. 2006 49 M 4th ventricle 1 GTR C3-C4, T7 1 STR 19 years CHT NA [14]
McCall et al. 2006 30 F 4th ventricle 1 GTR C1-C7 1 STR 8 years CHT NED (17 months) [15]
McCall et al. 2006 22 F 4th ventricle 1 GTR Multiple 1 None 5 years CHT AWD (4 years) [15]
Uff et al. 2006 32 M 4th ventricle 1 GTR C7-T1 1 STR 3 years RT DOD (23 months) [16]
Kaptanoglu et al. 2007 51 F 4th ventricle 1 GTR L4-S1 1 STR 7 years None AWD (1 year) [17]
Jinhu et al. 2007 32 F 4th ventricle 1 GTR T8-T9 1 GTR 1 month RT NED (3 months) [18]
Ahn et al. 2007 42 F 4th ventricle, CPA 1 GTR L3-S1 1 STR 6 years CHT NA [19]
Akil et al. 2008 74 M 4th ventricle 1 GTR Multiple 1 None Synchronous None DOD (2 weeks) [20]
Palmer et al. 2010 74 M 4th ventricle 1 GTR T5-T8 2 STR 13 years RT NA [4]
Stuivenvolt et al. 2012 50 F 4th ventricle 1 GTR T9, S1-S2 2 STR 6 years RT AWD (15 months) [21]
Serifoglu et al. 2016 55 M 4th ventricle, cerebellum 1 STR Multiple 1 STR Synchronous CHT + RT AWD (1 year) [22]
Morshed et al. 2017 14 M 4th ventricle 1 GTR S1-S2 1 GTR Synchronous None NED (9 months) [23]
Ochoa-Cacique 2020 48 M 4th ventricle 1 GTR L3-L4 1 STR 7 years RT NA [24]
Karthigeyan et al. 2021 38 F CPA 1 GTR C2-C6 1 GTR 6 years RT AWD (14 months) [25]
Johnson et al. 2022 40 F 4th ventricle 1 GTR T8, L2 1 STR Synchronous None AWD (4.5 years) [26]
Johnson et al. 2022 11 F 4th ventricle 1 GTR Multiple 1 None 3 years None AWD (5 years) [26]
Present case 2024 51 M 4th ventricle 1 GTR L4-L5, S1-S2 1 STR Synchronous RT AWD (6 months)
PT, primary tumour; MT, metastatic tumour; FU, follow-up; WHO, World Health Organization; CPA, cerebellopontine angle; GTR, gross-total resection; STR, sub-total resection; CHT, chemotherapy; RT, radiotherapy; AWD, alive with disease; DOD, dead of disease; NED, not evidence of disease; NA, not available.
Table I. Full summary of clinicopathological features of reported choroid plexus papilloma cases with disseminated spinal drop lesions.

References

  1. Hawkins C, Pietsch T, Malkin D. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Central Nervous System Tumours. International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2021.
  2. Krishnan S, Brown P, Scheithauer B. Choroid plexus papillomas: a single institutional experience. J Neurooncol. 2004;68(1):49-55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/b:neon.0000024745.06073.07.
  3. Jeibmann A, Hasselblatt M, Gerss J. Prognostic implications of atypical histologic features in choroid plexus papilloma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2006;65(11):1069-73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jnen.0000240464.26005.90.
  4. Palmer C, Kalsi P, Scoones D. Recurrence of fourth ventricular choroid plexus papilloma with late occurrence of a spinal drop metastasis. Br J Neurosurg. 2010;24(4):482-4. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2010.487135.
  5. Choi Y, Choi S, Koh E. Comprehensive multiomics analysis reveals distinct differences between pediatric choroid plexus papilloma and carcinoma. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2024;12(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-024-01814-y.
  6. Masuzawa T, Shimabukuro H, Yoshimizu N, Sato F. Ultrastructure of disseminated choroid plexus papilloma. Acta Neuropathol. 1981;54(4):321-4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00697007.
  7. Domingues R, Taveras J, Reimer P. Foramen magnum choroid plexus papilloma with drop metastases to the lumbar spine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12(3):564-5.
  8. Shakespeare T, Slancar M, Mallik A. CSF dissemination of a benign choroid plexus papilloma (CPP). Aust N Z J Med. 1997;27(5):597-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.1997.tb00973.x.
  9. Leblanc R, Bekhor S, Melanson D. Diffuse craniospinal seeding from a benign fourth ventricle choroid plexus papilloma. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1998;88(4):757-60. doi:https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.4.0757.
  10. Jagielski J, Zabek M, Wierzba-Bobrowicz T. Disseminating histologically benign multiple papilloma of the choroid plexus: case report. Folia Neuropathol. 2001;39(3):209-13.
  11. Heese O, Lamszus K, Grzyska U. Diffuse arachnoidal enhancement of a well differentiated choroid plexus papilloma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002;144(7):723-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-002-0960-3.
  12. McEvoy A, Galloway M, Revesz T. Metastatic choroid plexus papilloma: a case report. J Neurooncol. 2002;56(3):241-6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015044012574.
  13. Doglietto F, Lauretti L, Tartaglione T. Diffuse craniospinal choroid plexus papilloma with involvement of both cerebellopontine angles. Neurology. 2005;65(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000167136.64675.9e.
  14. Yu H, Yao T, Spooner J. Delayed occurrence of multiple spinal drop metastases from a posterior fossa choroid plexus papilloma. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4(6):494-6. doi:https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2006.4.6.494.
  15. McCall T, Binning M, Blumenthal D. Variations of disseminated choroid plexus papilloma: 2 case reports and a review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 2006;66(1):62-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2005.09.023.
  16. Uff C, Galloway M, Bradford R. Metastatic atypical choroid plexus papilloma: a case report. J Neurooncol. 2007;82(1):69-74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-006-9238-6.
  17. Kaptanoglu E, Tun K, Celikmez R. Spinal drop metastasis of choroid plexus papilloma. J Clin Neurosci. 2007;14(4):381-3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2005.12.017.
  18. Jinhu Y, Jianping D, Jun M. Metastasis of a histologically benign choroid plexus papilloma: case report and review of the literature. J Neurooncol. 2007;83(1):47-52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-006-9300-4.
  19. Ahn S, Cho Y. Spinal drop metastasis from a posterior fossa choroid plexus papilloma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2007;42(6):475-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2007.42.6.475.
  20. Akil H, Coupe N, Singh J. Spinal deposits of a benign choroid plexus papilloma. J Clin Neurosci. 2008;15(6):708-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2007.05.026.
  21. Stuivenvolt M, Mandl E, Verheul J. Atypical transformation in sacral drop metastasis from posterior fossa choroid plexus papilloma. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-01-2012-5681.
  22. Serifoglu I, Oz I, Yazgan O. Spinal seeding of choroid plexus papilloma. Spine J. 2016;16(7):421-2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.12.089.
  23. Morshed R, Lau D, Sun P. Spinal drop metastasis from a benign fourth ventricular choroid plexus papilloma in a pediatric patient: case report. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017;20(5):471-479. doi:https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.PEDS17130.
  24. Ochoa-Cacique D, Córdoba-Mosqueda M, Aguilar-Calderón J. Spinal drop of atypical choroid plexus papilloma in an adult patient: A case report and literature review. Surg Neurol Int. 2020;11. doi:https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_649_2020.
  25. Karthigeyan M, Salunke P, Siroliya A. “Benign” Choroid Plexus Papilloma with “Atypical” Transformation and Spinal Drop Lesions. Neurol India. 2021;69(6):1890-1892. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.333457.
  26. Johnson G, Mian A, Dahiya S. Cystic dissemination of choroid plexus papilloma: illustrative cases. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2022;4(20). doi:https://doi.org/10.3171/CASE22360.
  27. Jeibmann A, Hasselblatt M, Gerss J. Prognostic implications of atypical histologic features in choroid plexus papilloma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2006;65(11):1069-73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jnen.0000240464.26005.90.
  28. Wrede B, Hasselblatt M, Peters O. Atypical choroid plexus papilloma: clinical experience in the CPT-SIOP-2000 study. J Neurooncol. 2009;95(3):383-392. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-009-9936-y.
  29. Varga Z, Vajtai I. Prognostic markers in the histopathological diagnosis of tumours of the choroid plexus. Orv Hetil. 1998;139(13):761-5.
  30. Carlotti C, Salhia B, Weitzman S. Evaluation of proliferative index and cell cycle protein expression in choroid plexus tumours in children. Acta Neuropathol. 2002;103(1):1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s004010100419.
  31. Yankelevich M, Finlay J, Gorsi H. Molecular insights into malignant progression of atypical choroid plexus papilloma. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2021;7(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/mcs.a005272.
  32. Japp A, Gessi M, Messing-Jünger M. High-resolution genomic analysis does not qualify atypical plexus papilloma as a separate entity among choroid plexus tumours. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2015;74(2):110-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0000000000000154.
  33. Thomas C, Sill M, Ruland V. Methylation profiling of choroid plexus tumours reveals 3 clinically distinct subgroups. Neuro Oncol. 2016;18(6):790-6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov322.
  34. Yang Z, Jiang H, He D. Developing a nomogram based on SEER database for predicting prognosis in choroid plexus tumours. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63218-1.
  35. Bahar M, Hashem H, Tekautz T. Choroid plexus tumours in adult and pediatric populations: the Cleveland Clinic and University Hospitals experience. J Neurooncol. 2017;132(3):427-432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2384-1.
  36. Ortega-Martínez M, Cabezudo-Artero J, Fernández-Portales I. Diffuse leptomeningeal seeding from benign choroid plexus papilloma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2007;149(12):1229-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-007-1292-0.
  37. Anderson M, Theeler B, Penas-Prado M. Bevacizumab use in disseminated choroid plexus papilloma. J Neurooncol. 2013;114(2):251-3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1180-9.

Downloads

Authors

Filippo Nozzoli - University of Florence

Agnese Pedone

Elena Nucci

Manuel Camelia

Giovanni Muscas

Tommaso Casseri

Francesca Di Pasquale

Isacco Desideri

Enrico Fainardi

Lorenzo Livi

Alessandro Della Puppa

How to Cite
Nozzoli, F., Pedone, A., Nucci, E., Camelia, M., Muscas, G., Casseri, T., Di Pasquale, F., Desideri, I., Fainardi, E., Livi, L., & Della Puppa, A. (2025). Spinal drop metastases of choroid plexus papilloma: a brief report and updated literature review. Pathologica - Journal of the Italian Society of Anatomic Pathology and Diagnostic Cytopathology, 117(4). https://doi.org/10.32074/1591-951X-N818
  • Abstract viewed - 635 times
  • PDF downloaded - 196 times